The adrenaline of the spring tax deadline has finally subsided. For many accounting professionals across the United States, late April brings a much-needed exhale—a brief window to power down the monitors, clear the backlog of unread emails, and finally take a weekend off. But for practice leaders and firm owners, this quiet period is arguably the most critical juncture of the year. The dust has settled, but the real work of future-proofing the firm has just begun.

Before the relief of the off-season fully sets in, industry experts are urging firm owners to conduct a rigorous internal audit. A recent "tax season report card" published by Wolters Kluwer Tax and Accounting highlights that surviving the busy season is no longer the benchmark for success; firms must actively evaluate staff preparedness, workload balance, and, crucially, their pricing strategies to remain viable in an increasingly complex landscape.

This internal reflection comes at a time when the external environment is shifting rapidly beneath our feet. From existential debates over the role of artificial intelligence to aggressive new state tax audit strategies and evolving FASB guidance on digital assets, the definition of a "successful" tax practice is being rewritten. Let's explore the key areas every firm owner needs to evaluate in their 2026 post-season postmortem.

Grading Internal Operations: Burnout and the Pricing Problem

The first step in any post-season evaluation is looking inward. The Wolters Kluwer insights challenge business owners to ask hard questions about how their operations held up under pressure. If your staff spent the last three weeks of the season running on fumes and caffeine, your firm doesn't have a volume problem—it has a process and pricing problem.

Key Questions for Your Firm's Report Card

Did our pricing reflect the actual complexity of the work? As the tax code grows more convoluted, flat-fee or legacy hourly billing models often fail to capture the value of the advisory work embedded in standard compliance.
Was workload distributed equitably? Did bottlenecks occur around specific partners or reviewers, indicating a need for better delegation or technology-assisted triage?
How prepared was the staff for new regulatory hurdles? Did junior staff have the training necessary to spot emerging issues, or was the burden entirely on senior leadership?

Firms that fail to adjust their pricing strategies post-season risk entering a vicious cycle: underpricing leads to overwork, which leads to staff burnout, ultimately resulting in the talent attrition that is currently plaguing the broader U.S. accounting profession.

Key Takeaway: Do not wait until November to adjust your fee structure. Use the fresh data from this past tax season to identify unprofitable clients, adjust billing to reflect advisory value, and communicate fee increases while the memory of the value delivered is still fresh in the client's mind.

The AI Elephant: Do We Even Need Tax Pros?

As firms evaluate their internal efficiency, they must also confront the technological leaps happening outside their walls. A recent Monday Morning Accounting News Brief from Going Concern highlighted Deloitte's latest predictions on AI automation in business decisions, sparking a provocative, industry-wide debate: Do we even need tax pros anymore?

The short answer is yes—but the nature of the role is transforming. Generative AI and advanced automation are rapidly commoditizing basic data entry and simple compliance tasks. However, AI lacks the contextual judgment, ethical grounding, and strategic foresight required to navigate high-stakes financial decisions.

"The firms that will thrive aren't competing against AI; they are leveraging it to eliminate the mundane, freeing up their human capital to do what algorithms cannot: interpret ambiguity, manage client anxiety, and provide strategic foresight."

Furthermore, human accountability remains paramount. The same Going Concern roundup noted the recent sentencing of a Connecticut CPA for tax evasion—a stark reminder of the ethical guardrails and legal responsibilities that rest firmly on human shoulders. Technology can process the numbers, but the fiduciary duty and ethical judgment remain the exclusive domain of the licensed professional.

The Expanding Web of State Tax Nexus

If you need further proof that human expertise is irreplaceable, look no further than the evolving labyrinth of State and Local Tax (SALT). While federal tax grabs the headlines, state revenue departments are quietly revolutionizing their audit strategies.

According to a recent insight report from BDO, U.S. states are sharpening their audit strategies and aggressively expanding nexus concepts. The catalyst? The permanent shift to remote workforces and the explosion of digital commerce.

States are no longer just looking for physical warehouses or brick-and-mortar storefronts. They are establishing nexus based on digital contacts, remote employees, and economic thresholds. For remote businesses selling into the U.S., the compliance risks have skyrocketed.

Traditional vs. Emerging Nexus Triggers

Audit Focus Area	Traditional View	Emerging State Audit Triggers (2026)
Physical Presence	Offices, warehouses, owned real estate.	A single remote employee working from a home office; temporary traveling sales staff.
Economic Nexus	Significant physical sales within state lines.	Strict transaction counts or revenue thresholds, regardless of physical presence.
Digital Contacts	Servers located in the state.	Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) usage, digital advertising footprints, and digital product downloads.

For accounting professionals, this represents a massive advisory opportunity. Reviewing your clients' remote work footprints and digital sales channels during the off-season can prevent disastrous state tax surprises next year.

FASB's Crypto Catch-Up: Stablecoins and Wrapped Tokens

Finally, any post-season evaluation must look ahead to emerging asset classes that will complicate future compliance. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is continuing its push to modernize U.S. GAAP for the digital age.

As reported by CBIZ, FASB has tentatively decided to expand its digital asset guidance to explicitly include wrapped tokens and stablecoins. Previously, the lack of clear guidance on whether these digital assets should be treated as cash equivalents or intangible assets created massive headaches for corporate controllers and tax preparers alike.

This tentative guidance will significantly impact crypto taxation and financial reporting. Firms that serve tech-forward clients, e-commerce businesses, or high-net-worth individuals must use this post-season window to upskill their teams on digital asset accounting. The complexity of tracking basis, fair value measurement, and the specific GAAP treatment of stablecoins is exactly the kind of high-value advisory work that justifies the premium pricing models recommended by Wolters Kluwer.

Looking Ahead: The Blueprint for 2027

The end of tax season is not the finish line; it is the starting block for next year. The firms that will dominate the U.S. accounting landscape in the late 2020s are using this moment to grade their performance ruthlessly.

By asking the hard questions about pricing and staff workload, embracing AI as a tool rather than fearing it as a replacement, and proactively mastering emerging complexities like digital state nexus and FASB's crypto guidance, practice owners can transform their firms from reactive compliance shops into indispensable advisory powerhouses. The report cards are in—now it's time to do the homework.