Uncovering the economic framework that explains China's 400-year stagnation and its path to modern transformation.
In 1700 China's output per person sat at ninety-nine percent of the world average. By 1952 it was twenty-three percent. That collapse is the subject of this three-part series, and the explanation is not the one most histories give.
This first course builds the analytical tools before it touches the history, because the argument the series makes about China cannot be judged by anyone who has not been handed the means to judge it. It opens with scarcity, opportunity cost, and the three questions every society must answer. It then compares how command and market systems answer them, and it treats the failure of central planning as a structural problem rather than a moral one. A planning board of honest, capable officials with a fast computer still fails, and the course explains precisely why, through the economic calculation problem, the knowledge problem, and the arithmetic of effort and reward. It gives equal attention to what competition actually does, including the half of the price mechanism people usually forget, which is the role of losses in shutting bad ideas down.
A short section on measurement follows, covering what GDP counts, the three ways of counting it, what it leaves out, and why real and nominal figures tell different stories.
The final part turns to China before 1949 and sets a puzzle. By the standards the course has just established, the traditional Chinese economy performs well. Markets were competitive, entry and exit were easy, land and labor were mobile, and production was efficient. It should have industrialized. It did not. Mark Elvin's high-level equilibrium trap supplies the answer, and the closing lesson is that efficiency tells you how well you are using the technology you already have, and nothing about whether you will ever get a better one.
The hour closes on the eve of 1949, with a country at twenty-three percent of the world average about to adopt, deliberately, the system this course has just scored an F.
By the end of this course, participants will be able to:
Apply opportunity cost to a resource allocation decision and distinguish the cost of a choice from its accounting price.
Identify the three fundamental economic questions in a real policy setting and name the mechanism answering each.
Explain why central planning fails on structural grounds, citing the calculation problem, the knowledge problem, and the incentive arithmetic, rather than attributing failure to the character of planners.
Distinguish allocative from productive efficiency and diagnose which one a given economy has failed.
Interpret real and nominal GDP figures correctly and state what GDP does not measure.
Explain the high-level equilibrium trap and why an efficient economy can fail to industrialize.
Audience:
Accountants, lawyers, financial professionals, engineers, and anyone required to complete continuing professional development who wants a rigorous treatment of economic systems rather than a survey.
Associate Professor of Economics | King's University College at Western
Dr. Jason Dean is an economics professor and applied economist with experience teaching macroeconomics, microeconomics, labour economics, economic history, public policy, and applied economic topics to university, college, and professional audiences. He holds a PhD in Economics from McGill University, an MA in Economics from the University of Guelph, and an Honours BBA from Wilfrid Laurier University. His academic work focuses on labour markets, immigration, housing, poverty, economic history, and public policy. He has also worked as a health economist and economic research analyst, bringing both academic and applied experience to his teaching. Jason has taught at King’s University College, Wilfrid Laurier University, Sheridan College, McMaster University Continuing Education, McGill University, Kwansei Gakuin University in Japan, Renmin University in Beijing, and Wuhan University of Technology. His courses are built to make economic ideas practical, clear, and useful for real decisions. His peer-reviewed research has appeared in journals including Regional Science and Urban Economics, Cliometrica, Journal of Housing Economics, IZA Journal of Development and Migration, Contemporary Jewry, Journal of International Migration and Integration, International Journal of Social Economics, and health economics journals. His policy work has been published through the Montreal Economic Institute, and he has provided media commentary on labour markets, housing, public policy, immigration, and the Canadian economy. Jason’s CPD courses help professionals understand how economic indicators, policy decisions, inflation, GDP, interest rates, labour markets, and consumer demand connect to business conditions, client decisions, financial planning, and the broader economy. Selected Publications: - “Income Decline, Financial Insecurity, Landlord Screening and Renter Mobility,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2022. - “The Linguistic Wage Gap in Québec, 1901 to 1951,” Cliometrica, 2022. - “Sexual Orientation and Homeownership in Canada,” Journal of Housing Economics, 2020. - “Does it Matter if Immigrants Work in Jobs Related to their Education?” IZA Journal of Development and Migration, 2018. - “Labour Market Attainment of Canadian Jews During the First Two Decades of the 20th Century,” Contemporary Jewry, 2017. - “Economic Integration of Pre-WWI Immigrants from the British Isles in the Canadian Labour Market,” Journal of International Migration and Integration, 2016. - “Religiosity and Female Labour Market Attainment in Canada: The Protestant Exception,” International Journal of Social Economics, 2016.
